Community Forums
Connect with us on LinkedIn
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    321

    Default RootKit Hunter Scan

    This auto runs on the server, But one thing I'm unsure of is a port warning.

    Performing check for backdoor ports
    Checking for TCP port 1524 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 1984 [ WARNING ]
    Checking for UDP port 2001 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 2006 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 2128 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 6666 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 6667 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 6668 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 6669 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 7000 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 13000 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 14856 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 25000 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 29812 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 31337 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 33369 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 47107 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 47018 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 60922 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 62883 [ Not found ]
    Checking for TCP port 65535 [ Not found ]


    Now I ran:

    netstat -lnptu
    But it shows nothing, Also ran: chkrootkit , This reported fine also, Newest Clam and thats fine to.

    I read this port and only one thing I can see on google results is Big Brother... Whats that ?
    Last edited by GaryT; 12-10-2010 at 11:12 AM.

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    321

    Default Re: RootKit Hunter Scan

    I see its part of the castcontrol system what I have installed.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    inside a catfish
    Posts
    963
    cPanel/Enkompass Access Level

    Root Administrator

    Default Re: RootKit Hunter Scan

    In addition to Netstat, using lsof can help you identify what is listening on a particular port (the app, the owner, etc)

    lsof -nP|grep TCP

    -P disables conversion of ports to names (based upon /etc/services)
    -n disables conversion of IP to hostname

    Using those lsof options will make TCP port numbers show up in the lsof listing and will _not_ resolve IP addresses to hostnames. It not only makes lsof display results faster, but it makes you able to easily tell what is listening on a particular TCP port.

    Mike

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    321

    Default Re: RootKit Hunter Scan

    Thanks mike, So for an example, If I wanted to stop that service on that port what do you suggest to do.

    Thanks in advance and for your time taken.

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    inside a catfish
    Posts
    963
    cPanel/Enkompass Access Level

    Root Administrator

    Default Re: RootKit Hunter Scan

    Gary,

    I'd issue a "kill <pid>" where <pid> is the second value in the lsof output. As an example...

    cpsrvd-ss 20795 root 3u IPv4 81400 TCP *:2082 (LISTEN)

    kill 20795

    Of course, if it is a legitimate service with its own start/stop scripts, I'd use those scripts to stop the service gracefully. If it's something you suspect is a malicious process, kill it directly.

    Mike

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Posts
    321

    Default Re: RootKit Hunter Scan

    We use Cast-Control for streaming, Now the file whats using that port is ioncube loaded sc_trans so I cannot understand due to the coded content.

    As I test I backed up the file, Downloaded from the authors website and replaced it, Yet I get the same results so I assume its legitimate.

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    inside a catfish
    Posts
    963
    cPanel/Enkompass Access Level

    Root Administrator

    Default Re: RootKit Hunter Scan

    Quote Originally Posted by GaryT View Post
    We use Cast-Control for streaming, Now the file whats using that port is ioncube loaded sc_trans so I cannot understand due to the coded content.

    As I test I backed up the file, Downloaded from the authors website and replaced it, Yet I get the same results so I assume its legitimate.
    Sounds like it is legit. As long as you are comfortable with the integrity of the author, I imagine the script is fine too. It's likely encoded to prevent its use/abuse by those people who don't pay for it.

    If you dont like the rootkit scan barking about that oddball port, there is probably someway to exempt that port from the rootkit test. The rootkit tester probably only sees it as a rootkit because of the port it is on, not because of what the actual app is doing.

    Mike

Similar Threads & Tags
Similar threads

  1. rootkit hunter
    By Sheldon in forum cPanel and WHM Discussions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 03-14-2010, 10:20 AM
  2. Warning at RootKit Hunter 1.3 Output
    By isputra in forum cPanel and WHM Discussions
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-07-2009, 09:49 PM
  3. How can I get rootkit hunter to email me the results?
    By BianchiDude in forum cPanel and WHM Discussions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-30-2008, 01:56 AM
  4. Rootkit Hunter Question
    By mickalo in forum cPanel and WHM Discussions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-13-2007, 04:49 PM
  5. Rootkit Hunter 1.1.5
    By eazistore in forum cPanel Developers
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 07-06-2005, 02:33 PM
Linkedin       Facebook       Twitter       RSS       Flickr       YouTube