Nginx + CloudLinuxOS + Varnish

[marcosv]

Hello, Anybody uses the server: Nginx + CloudLinuxOS + Varnish And could post a tutorial on how to install nginx.org? I await answers. : D

[onel0ve]

nope it will messed up server
you can run lite speed with cloudlinux

[weetabix]

nope it will messed up server
you can run lite speed with cloudlinux

Can you elaborate a bit please. You mean that the common setup with nginx as proxy will not work at all in cloudlinux? If so, why?

[iseletsk]

You can run nginx+cloudlinux or varnish+cloudlinux
Running nginx+varnish at the same time makes little sense as they both work as reverse proxy.

[marcosv]

You can run nginx+cloudlinux or varnish+cloudlinux
Running nginx+varnish at the same time makes little sense as they both work as reverse proxy.

Thank you.
It seems that I will use the same varnish+cloudlinux.

[xanubi]

Igor, it makes perfect sens nginx+varnish+apache+cloudlinux.

Nginx serves STATIC CONTENT and pass the rest to varnish. Varnish makes cache for Apache php in SUPHP.
It makes very sense and is a very powerful combination, it's faster than fastcgi and mod_php.

Cloudlinux will do is work at the apache level, and at the operation environment with cagefs.

[iseletsk]

Varnish can catch/serve static content as well, so why have 3 layers, if you can have only two?

[Juanzo]

We are only using Nginx since AFAIK, Varnish is useless unless you plan to cache content from the sites.

In our case, that would involve clients complaining that they are uploading files to the server and having to wait X seconds / minutes until they are updated.

[xanubi]

Varnish can catch/serve static content as well, so why have 3 layers, if you can have only two?

Igor, it's better for performance.
When you've a server with only 4g of memory and many clients, THOUSANDS of static content exists. Varnish cannot cache everything.
Nginx can serve all that very quickly, resolving all the problems.

Then, varnish will cache for little time php (specially if it is suphp), working like some kind of php cache.

The results are brilliant for shared hosting.

Another thing, when the varnish cache expires, apache will have to serve the static content until is cached again, which will make load on the server if you have many. With nginx, that doesn't happen.

[xanubi]

We are only using Nginx since AFAIK, Varnish is useless unless you plan to cache content from the sites.

In our case, that would involve clients complaining that they are uploading files to the server and having to wait X seconds / minutes until they are updated.

You've to tweak and create exceptions, it's not difficult.

[Sannin]

Igor, it's better for performance.
When you've a server with only 4g of memory and many clients, THOUSANDS of static content exists. Varnish cannot cache everything.
Nginx can serve all that very quickly, resolving all the problems.

Then, varnish will cache for little time php (specially if it is suphp), working like some kind of php cache.

The results are brilliant for shared hosting.

Another thing, when the varnish cache expires, apache will have to serve the static content until is cached again, which will make load on the server if you have many. With nginx, that doesn't happen.

Do you use the cpanel nginx plugin and the cpanel varnish plugin on shared hosting server?

[wvelludo]

Do you use the cpanel nginx plugin and the cpanel varnish plugin on shared hosting server?

I use ngnix/cpanel/cloudlinux with this plugin cPnginx : cPanel Nginx plugin - Turbo boost your cPanel server with high stability

[prajithp]

I would suggest you to use apachebooster Apachebooster | High speed webserver configuration, it will freely work with cloudlinux.

[hostnex]

I would suggest you to use apachebooster Apachebooster | High speed webserver configuration, it will freely work with cloudlinux.

I installed apache booster and now getting 502 gateway error please help to resolve it.

[prajithp13]

Please run the below command, paste here the output.

/etc/init.d/apachebooster status.