New high rate of false positives in Mailscanner?

[dory36]

Over the past week or two I have been getting a lot of false alarms on mail that had been handled fine for many months. By "a lot" I mean maybe a dozen a day, versus about 1 a week until recently.

Bayes seems to be to blame for many, but not all.

I have seen before, but can't find now, info on rebuilding the bayes database. Any pointers, or other suggestions?

[graham_w]

I too noticed an increase, and the those emails had Bayes_99 scoring, which scored those particular emails at 5 and marked them as Spam. I went looking for a way to rebuild the Bayes database but couldn't find it. So I disabled Bayes checking until I had some spare time to look into it further. It's stopped the false positives, and seems to be catching all the Spam without it, so I may leave it disabled. From what i've read Bayes adds a load to the server when checking.

[verdon]

Same for me, same cause. Seems more prominent in one domain, but it is a busy domain with a lot of users.

[chirpy]

It's due to new rules included in the base set for SpamAssassin v3.2.0. Left running they can disrupt the bayesian database and you see an increase in false-positives. You can either:

1. Do as graham_w suggests and disable bayes, though this can be a very useful resource

2. Increase the default low scoring spam value, though that could allow through more flase-negatives

3. Hunt down the rules causing the problems from the false-positive email headers and adjust their scores in a custom SA ruleset in /etc/mail/spamassassin/

[verdon]

Here's one that's typical of some of the false positives I've been getting.

cached not
score=9.592
8 required
5.00 BAYES_99 Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 100%
3.20 FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL From: localpart has series of non-vowel letters
0.00 HTML_MESSAGE HTML included in message
1.40 MIME_QP_LONG_LINE Quoted-printable line longer than 76 chars
-0.00 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record

... hard to know what to adjust. Other than the the BAYES_99 the bulk of the score is because of the from address which is not that odd of an address, mstrbjngls@ ... the message itself is pretty normal stuff

[sct1061]

I would just add the following to what chirpy has suggested:

4. If it seems that your bayes database has been "poisoned" by the increase in false positives, remove the bayesian database and start over. Depending on your email traffic, it may take a few days before bayes has enough spam and non-spam tokens to start scoring email again (I think it needs 200 of each before it starts working). To wipe out the bayesian db, do the following:

rm -Rvf /var/spool/mqueue/.spamassassin