Accounts over quota | suspend | non-suspend

[eagle]

(If I have been asleep during the time this feature was implemented, please point me in the right direction )

What we really, really, really would like, is a suspend policy based on individual accounts. So, that one account can be suspended when it reaches the set limit, and another can be active, and will have a post-paid bill, both being on the same server.

If I am correct, this is not possible at the moment. Are there any others that would like this?

[cPanelDavidG]

(If I have been asleep during the time this feature was implemented, please point me in the right direction )

What we really, really, really would like, is a suspend policy based on individual accounts. So, that one account can be suspended when it reaches the set limit, and another can be active, and will have a post-paid bill, both being on the same server.

If I am correct, this is not possible at the moment. Are there any others that would like this?

If you mean on an individual account level, this is not possible. However, with Reseller accounts, this is possible with respect to the resources consumed by the reseller as a whole, not their individual account(s).

You may wish to submit an official feature request for this at: http://bugzilla.cpanel.net

You can then paste the URL of your feature request here so others can vote on it.

[eagle]

If you mean on an individual account level, this is not possible. However, with Reseller accounts, this is possible with respect to the resources consumed by the reseller as a whole, not their individual account(s).

You may wish to submit an official feature request for this at: http://bugzilla.cpanel.net

You can then paste the URL of your feature request here so others can vote on it.

Thanks for the reply. I meant on a user level. Anyone (root or reseller) may have different arrangements with each of their customers (business/non-business etc.).

I will post a request and mention over here.

This is the report: http://bugzilla.cpanel.net/show_bug.cgi?id=6316