Community Forums
Connect with us on LinkedIn
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 14 of 14
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    80

    Lightbulb exim on xxx.xxxxxxxx.com failed

    I have tried everything

    i have done upcp --force
    eximup--force
    reinstalled exim... even changed from stable to current and from current to edge... have gone through all the threads but did not find any solution for my problem...

    nothing in exim_paniclog
    nothing different in exim_main log too..

    Yes but one thing is there that i have apf and bfd installed on my box

    and everyday around 400 Ip's get blocked cuz of being blacklisted in RBL's

    can some one suggest me what can be the problem....?


    any ideas????

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    80

    Default

    Strange that no one has any clue about it :-(

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    nasik india
    Posts
    3

    Default

    Very stange No idea (

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    80

    Default

    After looking at the /var/log/messages i was getting messages like:-

    Sep 21 18:36:53 nw1 kernel: ** IN_SANITY **IN=eth0 OUT= MAC=00:0d:61:43:75:38:00:0f:34:38:3c:8
    0:08:00 SRC=200.96.209.235 DST=xx.xxx.xxx.xx LEN=40 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=55 ID=9104 PROTO=TC
    P SPT=113 DPT=57952 WINDOW=0 RES=0x00 ACK RST FIN URGP=0
    Sep 21 18:40:02 ns1 BFD(13910): {exim} 221.135.226.3 exceeded login failures; executed ban com
    mand '/etc/apf/apf -d 221.135.226.3 {bfd.exim}'.
    Sep 21 18:40:08 ns1 BFD(13910): {exim} 222.241.176.73 exceeded login failures; executed ban co
    mmand '/etc/apf/apf -d 222.241.176.73 {bfd.exim}'.
    Sep 21 18:44:44 nw1 exim: clamd shutdown succeeded
    Sep 21 18:44:44 nw1 exim: exim shutdown failed
    Sep 21 18:44:44 nw1 exim: antirelayd shutdown succeeded
    Sep 21 18:44:45 nw1 exim: spamd shutdown succeeded
    Sep 21 18:44:47 nw1 exim: clamd startup succeeded
    Sep 21 18:44:47 nw1 exim: exim startup succeeded
    Sep 21 18:44:48 nw1 exim: exim startup succeeded
    Sep 21 18:44:48 nw1 exim: antirelayd startup succeeded
    Sep 21 18:44:50 nw1 exim: spamd startup succeeded
    Sep 21 18:44:50 nw1 antirelayd: antirelayd shutdown succeeded
    Sep 21 18:44:51 nw1 antirelayd: antirelayd startup succeeded


    at this point the exim was crashing... then i thought may be i should check my firewall... and then i upgraded the version of APF..earlier version of APF was 0.9.5 and now is 0.9.6...

    and my prolem is resolved....

    but i have a new issue now....my servers IP was getting blacklisted again and again at bl.spamcop.net then i had to write them a mail for asking about the reason.... the reply which i got is given below which i could not understand.... can some one help me out in this as in what they are trying to refer to??

    Reply from Spamcop People

    This server is sending Challenge/Response mails to the forged from addresses in spams inbound to the server. Effective spam management tools should place the burden either on the spammer, on the sending mailserver, or, at the very least, on the person receiving the benefits of the filtering (the mail recipient). Instead, Challenge/Response puts the burden on, at best, a person not directly benefitting, and, quite likely, a completely innocent party by sending the C/R to the forged "from" address. The sending mailserver which is sending the spam -- voluntarily or involuntarily via a compromised machine -- is not notified of the problem which it should be. The only beneficiary of C/R is the sender, at the cost of inconveniencing everyone else.


    Any suggestions?

  5. #5
    cPanel Partner NOC cPanel Partner NOC Badge AndyReed's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Minneapolis, MN
    Posts
    2,223

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by maverick23
    Reply from Spamcop People

    This server is sending Challenge/Response mails to the forged from addresses in spams inbound to the server. Effective spam management tools should place the burden either on the spammer, on the sending mailserver, or, at the very least, on the person receiving the benefits of the filtering (the mail recipient). Instead, Challenge/Response puts the burden
    Autoresponder is the culprit, in this case. Many users are using autoresponders to reply to their clients. Since these email addresses get hit with SPAM, autoresponder sends out/responds to these forged email addresses causing your mail server to get blacklisted by SpamCop, SpamHaus and many others. The best way is to disable these autoresponders, which is not possible for many of your clients. To see who is using autoresponder, run this command at the prompt:

    grep autorespond /etc/valiases/*

    Although this is not related to your issue, but just in case you need to learn how to disable delayed bounce back messages in exim, go to:
    http://www.farhad.ca/2006/07/27/how-...sages-in-exim/
    Andy Reed
    RHCE and CCNA
    ServerTune.com

  6. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by AndyReed
    Autoresponder is the culprit, in this case. Many users are using autoresponders to reply to their clients. Since these email addresses get hit with SPAM, autoresponder sends out/responds to these forged email addresses causing your mail server to get blacklisted by SpamCop, SpamHaus and many others. The best way is to disable these autoresponders, which is not possible for many of your clients. To see who is using autoresponder, run this command at the prompt:

    grep autorespond /etc/valiases/*

    Although this is not related to your issue, but just in case you need to learn how to disable delayed bounce back messages in exim, go to:
    http://www.farhad.ca/2006/07/27/how-...sages-in-exim/

    It's not just auto-responders.

    when a user quota is over limit, all the emails are bounced by exim, rather then rejecting it at the time of delivery... which really sucks! like it or not.. it is a serious problem... i was blacklisted by spamcop twice.. and I dont think cpanel is even bothering about it, as it's big problem..

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    80

    Default

    I am using this server for only my site's and i know there are no autoresponders.... can it be box trapper? as i have it enabled in most of my accounts....?
    Last edited by maverick23; 09-22-2006 at 12:37 AM.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    80

    Default

    just checked none of the accounts are over quota....

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    113

    Default

    ah.. that message wasn't for you, i posted in wrong thread.. sorry..

  10. #10
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by maverick23
    Reply from Spamcop People

    This server is sending Challenge/Response mails to the forged from addresses in spams inbound to the server. Effective spam management tools should place the burden either on the spammer, on the sending mailserver, or, at the very least, on the person receiving the benefits of the filtering (the mail recipient). Instead, Challenge/Response puts the burden on, at best, a person not directly benefitting, and, quite likely, a completely innocent party by sending the C/R to the forged "from" address. The sending mailserver which is sending the spam -- voluntarily or involuntarily via a compromised machine -- is not notified of the problem which it should be. The only beneficiary of C/R is the sender, at the cost of inconveniencing everyone else.


    Any suggestions?

    like it or not that is a problem with the way cpanel's mailing system is setup... when cpanel implemented quota system for email accounts.. they should have have implemented a way to reject emails at the time of delivery instead of bouncing them... so you'r left to find a way to bounce the emails at the time to reject emails at the time of delivery... so you can use a perl script to check if the account is 98-99% full.... and if it is.. reject the email...

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    113

    Default

    a small hint.. use /etc/exim.pl & ACL

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    cn
    Posts
    2

    Cool test more

    Quote Originally Posted by cynux
    a small hint.. use /etc/exim.pl & ACL
    yeah! you can do it best . trust yourself!

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    80

    Default

    already using it

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    113

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by maverick23
    already using it
    use it to check the quota of each user.. if it's 98% used.. reject they email or just defer it... choice is yours.. that'll fix the bounces for over quota accounts....
    Last edited by cynux; 09-22-2006 at 02:09 AM.

Similar Threads & Tags
Similar threads

  1. exim on serverX.xxx-xxxxxxxxx.xxx failed
    By jonyzinho in forum cPanel and WHM Discussions
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 03-19-2009, 02:40 PM
  2. Sorry xxx.xxx.xxx.175 is not a valid ip address!
    By PPNSteve in forum cPanel and WHM Discussions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-18-2008, 01:32 PM
  3. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 04-19-2007, 05:39 PM
  4. [statscheck] Stats/Server Overload on xxxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx
    By big in forum cPanel and WHM Discussions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-04-2005, 05:54 PM
  5. http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/~username
    By rahid in forum cPanel and WHM Discussions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-25-2004, 08:20 PM
Linkedin       Facebook       Twitter       RSS       Flickr       YouTube