Community Forums
Connect with us on LinkedIn
+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 12 of 12
  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    117

    Default will cpanel/whm support spf records?

    DNS Report (www.dnsreport.com) now states:

    Warn: Your domain does not have an SPF record. This means that spammers can easily send out E-mail that looks like it came from your domain, which can make your domain look bad (if the recipient thinks you really sent it), and can cost you money (when people complain to you, rather than the spammer). You may want to add an SPF record before October 1, 2004, the target date for domains to have SPF records in place.

    Will Cpanel/WHM automatically create the appropriate SPF recoreds for each account?

  2. #2
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,020

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff-C
    You may want to add an SPF record before October 1, 2004, the target date for domains to have SPF records in place.
    Where did they pull this date?

    Please run a search for exisiting threads before creating duplicate threads. A simple search on 'SPF' would have revealed a half dozen or so discussions (some as feature requests) about this topic.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2002
    Posts
    93

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by SarcNBit
    Where did they pull this date?
    It's the date AOL is going to switch to using SPF for their 'whitelisted' senders. Note, this doesn't mean you get whitelisted by aol just for having a valid SPF -- this refers to senders AOL has in their own 'whitelist'. If you are considered a 'whitelist' sender with AOL, then you will want to implement an SPF record in your DNS to retain that status.

    Other than that, I don't see any reason CP needs to rush -- might as well wait and see how things flush-out over the coming months... there are bound to be revisions to the system.


    Edit, correction... it's Microsoft/Hotmail which set the date:

    "Microsoft's announcement means that beginning in October, the company will check inbound e-mail's source IP address for an SPF record. In other words, Microsoft will check whether the person responsible for that outbound mail server has published an SFP record. E-mail that passes the SPF test will be passed through for delivery. E-mail that doesn't pass this simple test must go through additional hoops before it can be delivered to the inbox."
    http://www.clickz.com/experts/em_mkt...nt.php/3388371

    http://slashdot.org/articles/04/07/2...id=109&tid=111
    Last edited by myrem; 08-07-2004 at 11:04 PM.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    1,020

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by myrem
    It's the date AOL is going to switch to using SPF for their 'whitelisted' senders

    Edit, correction... it's Microsoft/Hotmail which set the date:
    Thanks for the tip. I have been looking into SPF (or CallerID for email or whatever MS is going to call their version), and am not convinced that it is the end all for spam. It certainly seems less of a nightmare than the challenge/response system AOL plans to implement after buying Mailblocks Inc. .

  5. #5
    Member rs-freddo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    836
    cPanel/Enkompass Access Level

    Root Administrator

    Default

    It's not supposed to be the "end all" for spam - it simply stops joe-jobbing.
    Michael

  6. #6
    Member rs-freddo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    836
    cPanel/Enkompass Access Level

    Root Administrator

    Default

    I read a little about Mailblocks and their challenge/response is better than ASK or Boxtrapper - both boxtrapper and ASK can have spam delivered by utilising a simple autoresponder. Mailblocks really does require human intervention. However I am not convinced of challenge/response 's worth. Sure it keeps the inbox clean but it basically doubles your email traffic. Spammers will keep sending and you'll keep challenging, effectively doubling the work of your email server. I have had spammers sending to non existent email addresses for three years - it simply doesn't matter to them. Rather than challenging these spams I cut my loses and block them at smtp - this is the least work on the email server.

    With challenge/response i can see the email load going higher and higher until it eventually shuts down email delivery. It's not a solution to spam, just a clean inbox solution. Better clients use a whitelist like Qurb and halve the load on the email system.
    Michael

  7. #7
    Member albatroz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Virtual Orbis / Peru
    Posts
    122
    cPanel/Enkompass Access Level

    Root Administrator

    Default SPF in Cpanel, when? or how?

    SPF will certainly help to block spam sent to providers like Hotmail and AOL and so on.

    But will not help you block spam sent to your server unless SPF filtering is implemented
    in your Cpanel in some way.... SpamAssassin 3.0 is said to support it. But guest what?
    Cpanel still comes with SA version 2.63 (while the current version is 2.64) ....

    BTW I am not sure about numbers but most of the spam I receive come from forged
    hotmail, aol and yahoo addresses, imagine my happiness if I could avoid them all....
    Last edited by albatroz; 09-17-2004 at 10:43 AM.

  8. #8
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    White Haven, PA, US
    Posts
    159

    Default

    This is also being tracked in our bugzilla

    http://bugzilla.cpanel.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1030

  9. #9
    Member albatroz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Virtual Orbis / Peru
    Posts
    122
    cPanel/Enkompass Access Level

    Root Administrator

    Default

    Does it mean that we can finally create SPF compliant TXT DNS entries with WHM zone editor?

    Quote Originally Posted by cpaneljosh
    This is also being tracked in our bugzilla

    http://bugzilla.cpanel.net/show_bug.cgi?id=1030

  10. #10
    Member rs-freddo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    836
    cPanel/Enkompass Access Level

    Root Administrator

    Default

    You always could - just make sure it's not the last entry.
    Michael

  11. #11
    Super Moderator This forum account has been confirmed by cPanel staff to represent a vendor. chirpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Go on, have a guess
    Posts
    13,495

    Default

    And if (when?) implemented, please make it optional for those of us who don't want them
    Jonathan Michaelson

    Need your cPanel servers secured and tuned?
    cPanel Server Configuration, Security, Recovery and Antivirus/AntiSpam Services
    Developers of the most effective (and free) Firewall & Security Solution for cPanel Servers - csf
    http://www.configserver.com

  12. #12
    Member casey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    If there is trouble, it will find me
    Posts
    2,336

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by chirpy
    And if (when?) implemented, please make it optional for those of us who don't want them
    I'll second that request.

Similar Threads & Tags
Similar threads

  1. SPF records
    By valleytech in forum cPanel and WHM Discussions
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 09-24-2007, 05:13 PM
  2. Replies: 21
    Last Post: 04-12-2007, 06:57 PM
  3. SPF records
    By bsasninja in forum cPanel and WHM Discussions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-16-2006, 11:24 PM
  4. WHM/cpanel renders SPF records useless!
    By cyberspirit in forum cPanel and WHM Discussions
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-27-2004, 03:02 PM
Linkedin       Facebook       Twitter       RSS       Flickr       YouTube