cPanel Forums

boeki · #16 (**permalink**) 03-17-2007, 12:34 PM

i manually added some clients (in the form @domain.com on its own line in rules/RULE_spam_lover) via the assp interface (domain.com:55555) but it shows as enabled in the cpanel interface.

i also added some clients (in the form @domain1.com|@domain2.com|etc) in the unprocessed addresses list via the assp interface but the domain's assp cpanel interface still shows as "enabled" for all filters.

ispro · #17 (**permalink**) 03-17-2007, 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boeki

i manually added some clients (in the form @domain.com on its own line in rules/RULE_spam_lover) via the assp interface (domain.com:55555) but it shows as enabled in the cpanel interface.

Let me know the full permissions of the file "rules/RULE_spam_lover" I suppose it may be broken by ASSP web interface...

Quote:

Originally Posted by boeki

i also added some clients (in the form @domain1.com|@domain2.com|etc) in the unprocessed addresses list via the assp interface but the domain's assp cpanel interface still shows as "enabled" for all filters.

Ough! It was a nice point! I'm going to add the check for unprocessed domains at cPanel interface. It will be included in the next release (1.2.0).

ispro · #18 (**permalink**) 03-17-2007, 01:19 PM

To organize things not processed addresses/domains are moved to separate "files/addrnp.txt" file! It means you would be needed to re-add your not processed domains to this list. If you are using assp.cfg.override, remove the entry from it. Otherwise new feature won't work for you.

boeki · #19 (**permalink**) 03-17-2007, 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ispro

Let me know the full permissions of the file "rules/RULE_spam_lover" I suppose it may be broken by ASSP web interface...

-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 61 Mar 17 12:01 bayesian_spam_lover
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 41 Mar 17 06:10 blacklisted_spam_lover
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 41 Mar 17 06:10 bomb_spam_lover
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 41 Mar 17 06:10 delay_spam_lover
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 41 Mar 17 06:10 helo_spam_lover
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 41 Mar 17 06:10 invalid_spam_lover
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 41 Mar 17 06:10 mxa_spam_lover
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 41 Mar 17 06:10 penalty_spam_lover
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 41 Mar 17 06:10 ptr_spam_lover
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 41 Mar 17 06:10 rbl_spam_lover
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 41 Mar 17 06:10 spf_spam_lover
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 41 Mar 17 06:10 srs_spam_lover
-rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 41 Mar 17 06:10 uribl_spam_lover

weedy · #20 (**permalink**) 03-17-2007, 02:08 PM

just a heads up

Code:

# Redirect MTA to port 125 to enable ASSP
local_interfaces = 127.0.0.1.125

Code:

==> /var/log/exim_mainlog <==
2007-03-17 14:44:28 exim 4.63 daemon started: pid=22202, -q1h, listening for SMTP on [127.0.0.1]:125
2007-03-17 14:44:28 Start queue run: pid=22203
2007-03-17 14:44:28 End queue run: pid=22203
2007-03-17 14:44:28 socket bind() to port 125 for address 127.0.0.1 failed: Address already in use: waiting 30s before trying again (9 more tries)

Code:

# Redirect MTA to port 125 to enable ASSP
local_interfaces = 127.0.0.1
daemon_smtp_ports = 125

Code:

2007-03-17 14:55:35 exim 4.63 daemon started: pid=23367, -q1h, listening for SMTP on [127.0.0.1]:125
2007-03-17 14:55:35 Start queue run: pid=23368
2007-03-17 14:55:35 End queue run: pid=23368

cpanel starts 2 versions of exim. one with ssl and one without. so we need to change only the smtp version. please update your addon to reflect the proper way configuring exim.

ispro · #21 (**permalink**) 03-17-2007, 05:21 PM

These permissions look good. If you may, let me know how to login to your server to check what is going on. Send me PM.

ispro · #22 (**permalink**) 03-17-2007, 05:27 PM

weedy, it was already taken care of in 1.2.1 right before you sent your message

Anyway thank you for the input!

ispro · #23 (**permalink**) 03-17-2007, 06:42 PM

1.2.1 released:

Added option to install recommended Exim configuration files.
Added option to search for known incompatible strings in existing exim.conf.local file.
WHM interface doesn't show ASSP options if ASSP not installed/recognized.
New file added "files/addrnp.txt". It is for not processed addresses (mainly for domains).
Not processed domains are now considered to have all filters disabled with words "Not processed".
Added option to add/remove domain to not processed list.
ASSP updated to 1.3.1.13.
Added check at cPanel interface to accept known/allowed filters only.
Fixed daemon_smtp_ports at exim.conf

weedy · #24 (**permalink**) 03-17-2007, 09:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ispro

weedy, it was already taken care of in 1.2.1 right before you sent your message

Anyway thank you for the input!

damn it, why cant i ever be elitist.

boeki · #25 (**permalink**) 03-18-2007, 01:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ispro

These permissions look good. If you may, let me know how to login to your server to check what is going on. Send me PM.

found out what the problem was. there was no problem!

i was looking at an account's cpanel via admin login (whm) and it was showing the wrong enabled/disabled settings. when i logged in via the account's login, the settings reflected the correct status.

on another matter, the latest asspx changelog show "Added files/addrnp.txt" but it is not on the files folder. i created it and entered accounts on the not processed list then changed the assp config for "file:files/addrnp.xt" instead of the list of domains but the status on cpanel interface shows differently.

i tried/modified/tried/etc. then i found out that the files folder had a 750 privelege and after setting it to 755, things went well.

the changelog also stated assp was updated to 1.3.1.13 but whm asspx still shows 1.3.1.9 as the latest.

weedy · #26 (**permalink**) 03-18-2007, 02:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by boeki

the changelog also stated assp was updated to 1.3.1.13 but whm asspx still shows 1.3.1.9 as the latest.

agreed, nothing a force update won't fix

WireNine · #27 (**permalink**) 03-18-2007, 03:32 AM

Does this include a cpanel interface for the end-user to control their spam filters?

weedy · #28 (**permalink**) 03-18-2007, 05:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WireNine

Does this include a cpanel interface for the end-user to control their spam filters?

yes (now im wasting 10 chars)

ispro · #29 (**permalink**) 03-18-2007, 10:45 AM

boeki, I really would like to see your server! Because all of these issues you mentioned are verified as not-existence! Permissions for "files" are 751 and you should also notice that.

Perhaps FORCING ASSP update will help?

P.S. There is a bug in versions comparison. It actually check string 2 string instead of float so I'm aware of the bug and just need to think about better way to compare versions...

WireNine · #30 (**permalink**) 03-18-2007, 12:41 PM

Can we see screenshots of the user-end interface?

Would this be a better replacement for Exim+Exiscan+Clamav+RBL+Spamassassin+SARE+Razor+DC C ?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode