DKIM set, still test shows permerror

Marc Escabas

Registered
May 5, 2016
1
0
1
Philippines
cPanel Access Level
Root Administrator
Hi,

I'm new with WHM, it would be much appreciated if someone help me with my problem. I'm worried about the permerror result that I'm getting with our email. We do have several domains on our VPS and DKIM is set to all domains/accounts, but when verified, the result is permerror.

I've tried uninstall/install, but nothing, still permerror.

Can you guys help me please? I'm afraid that it might be the reason some of our emails go to spam.

Code:
==========================================================
Summary of Results
==========================================================
SPF check:          pass
DomainKeys check:   neutral
DKIM check:         permerror
Sender-ID check:    pass
SpamAssassin check: ham

==========================================================
Details:
==========================================================

HELO hostname:  host.p******a.net
Source IP:      x.x.x.x
mail-from:      [email protected]******a.com

----------------------------------------------------------
SPF check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result:         pass
ID(s) verified: [email protected]******a.com DNS record(s):
    pepperva.com. SPF (no records)
    pepperva.com. 2993 IN TXT "v=spf1 mx a ip4:x.x.x.x -all"
    pepperva.com. 71393 IN MX 0 p******a.com.
    pepperva.com. 71393 IN A x.x.x.x

----------------------------------------------------------
DomainKeys check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result:         neutral (message not signed)
ID(s) verified: [email protected]******a.com DNS record(s):

----------------------------------------------------------
DKIM check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result:         permerror (no usable key records)
ID(s) verified:
Canonicalized Headers:
    message-id:<[email protected]******a.com>'0D''0A'
    subject:check'0D''0A'
    to:[email protected]'0D''0A'
    from:[email protected]******a.com'0D''0A'
    date:Tue,'20'21'20'Jun'20'2016'20'16:54:14'20'-0400'0D''0A'
    content-transfer-encoding:7bit'0D''0A'
    content-type:text/plain;'20'charset=US-ASCII;'20'format=flowed'0D''0A'
    mime-version:1.0'0D''0A'
    dkim-signature:v=1;'20'a=rsa-sha256;'20'q=dns/txt;'20'c=relaxed/relaxed;'20'd=p******a.com;'20's=default;'20'h=Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:'20'Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:'20'Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:'20'Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:'20'List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;'20'bh=FfcssIknOQgb6S3x5PI4WNmYIc+oSGP2Ncz1wnQcxF4=;'20'b=;

Canonicalized Body:
    check'20'mic'20'test'0D''0A'
   

DNS record(s):
    default._domainkey.p******a.com. 72000 IN CNAME p******a.com.
    p******a.com. 2992 IN TXT "v=spf1 mx a ip4:67.227.192.79 -all"

NOTE: DKIM checking has been performed based on the latest DKIM specs (RFC 4871 or draft-ietf-dkim-base-10) and verification may fail for older versions.  If you are using Port25's PowerMTA, you need to use version 3.2r11 or later to get a compatible version of DKIM.

----------------------------------------------------------
Sender-ID check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
Result:         pass
ID(s) verified: [email protected]******a.com DNS record(s):
    pepperva.com. SPF (no records)
    pepperva.com. 2993 IN TXT "v=spf1 mx a ip4:x.x.x.x -all"
    pepperva.com. 71393 IN MX 0 p******a.com.
    pepperva.com. 71393 IN A x.x.x.x

----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin check details:
----------------------------------------------------------
SpamAssassin v3.4.0 (2014-02-07)

Result:         ham  (-1.8 points, 5.0 required)

pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
-0.0 SPF_HELO_PASS          SPF: HELO matches SPF record
-0.0 SPF_PASS               SPF: sender matches SPF record
-1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                            [score: 0.0000]
0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid

==========================================================
Explanation of the possible results (from RFC 5451) ==========================================================

SPF and Sender-ID Results
=========================

"none"
      No policy records were published at the sender's DNS domain.

"neutral"
      The sender's ADMD has asserted that it cannot or does not
      want to assert whether or not the sending IP address is authorized
      to send mail using the sender's DNS domain.

"pass"
      The client is authorized by the sender's ADMD to inject or
      relay mail on behalf of the sender's DNS domain.

"policy"
     The client is authorized to inject or relay mail on behalf
      of the sender's DNS domain according to the authentication
      method's algorithm, but local policy dictates that the result is
      unacceptable.

"fail"
      This client is explicitly not authorized to inject or
      relay mail using the sender's DNS domain.

"softfail"
      The sender's ADMD believes the client was not authorized
      to inject or relay mail using the sender's DNS domain, but is
      unwilling to make a strong assertion to that effect.

"temperror"
      The message could not be verified due to some error that
      is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability to
      retrieve a policy record from DNS.  A later attempt may produce a
      final result.

"permerror"
      The message could not be verified due to some error that
      is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being absent or
      a syntax error in a retrieved DNS TXT record.  A later attempt is
      unlikely to produce a final result.


DKIM and DomainKeys Results
===========================

"none"
      The message was not signed.

"pass"
      The message was signed, the signature or signatures were
      acceptable to the verifier, and the signature(s) passed
      verification tests.

"fail"
      The message was signed and the signature or signatures were
      acceptable to the verifier, but they failed the verification
      test(s).

"policy"
      The message was signed but the signature or signatures were
      not acceptable to the verifier.

"neutral"
      The message was signed but the signature or signatures
      contained syntax errors or were not otherwise able to be
      processed.  This result SHOULD also be used for other
      failures not covered elsewhere in this list.

"temperror"
      The message could not be verified due to some error that
      is likely transient in nature, such as a temporary inability
      to retrieve a public key.  A later attempt may produce a
      final result.

"permerror"
      The message could not be verified due to some error that
      is unrecoverable, such as a required header field being
      absent. A later attempt is unlikely to produce a final result.


==========================================================
Original Email
==========================================================

Return-Path: <[email protected]******a.com>
Received: from host.p******a.net (67.227.192.79) by verifier.port25.com id hd6kng20i3ga for <[email protected]>; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 16:54:16 -0400 (envelope-from <[email protected]******a.com>)
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; spf=pass [email protected]******a.com
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; domainkeys=neutral (message not signed) [email protected]******a.com
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; dkim=permerror (no usable key records)
Authentication-Results: verifier.port25.com; sender-id=pass [email protected]******a.com
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed;
    d=p******a.com; s=default; h=Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:
    Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:
    Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:
    Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:
    List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive;
     bh=FfcssIknOQgb6S3x5PI4WNmYIc+oSGP2Ncz1wnQcxF4=; b=lPZOg2a/yNHGDYVI5vwR5Tno+
    bky4S/ainXf6o+1+7btpDrhgQX8zgrmGGIX6hHVEa0+mICOCut/uV2bdYx2P8Ph1Cub2I0wRDJZ8d
    RgKc7CvJWI3rJiDDfkGjZNVfEYeZYWD8dQPga44v9KPxldSEd9qzqk3FN6sFdwEq63i4KhlzlL7gH
    8vdsI712FmqdydAGKwhU6IjTWRMICWKa4irQEK5z/PYEnUQt/xH69WF4lKUeByQOaGMYWR61FVrlE
    g8t/ccc/K6VT+HPaxYJOkcQkezq+L71o1LmG6mQP6DdNeNDH4RdYbDSKEeNr4LtPP0+SuSJlH2H4O
    KfDhir5eA==;
Received: from [::1] (port=55178 helo=host.p******a.net)
    by host.p******a.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.87)
    (envelope-from <[email protected]******a.com>)
    id 1bFSgY-0005We-9b
    for [email protected]; Wed, 22 Jun 2016 04:54:14 +0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII;  format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 16:54:14 -0400
From: [email protected]******a.com
To: [email protected]
Subject: check
Message-ID: <[email protected]>
X-Sender: [email protected]******a.com
User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.4
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - host.p******a.net
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - verifier.port25.com
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - p******a.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: host.p******a.net: authenticated_id: [email protected]******a.com
X-Authenticated-Sender: host.p******a.net: [email protected]******a.com
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:

check mic test