Please whitelist cPanel in your adblocker so that you’re able to see our version release promotions, thanks!

The Community Forums

Interact with an entire community of cPanel & WHM users!

Domainkeys & sender-id What should I do?

Discussion in 'E-mail Discussion' started by trucmuche, Mar 31, 2015.

  1. trucmuche

    trucmuche Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2014
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    8
    cPanel Access Level:
    Root Administrator
    Hello !

    I configured SPF and DKIM : all works fine (and I get "pass" in the port25 tests : YES ! :)).
    However, it seems that I need to configure some more things for getting "pass" for DomainKeys and Sender-id... but I don't know what to do and where I should do it... Could you advise me, please ?

    Here is the summary of the port25 result message...

    Many many thanks in advance !

    Trucmuche

    Code:
    [INDENT]===============================
    Summary of Results
    ===============================
    SPF check: pass
    DomainKeys check: neutral
    DKIM check: pass
    Sender-ID check: neutral
    SpamAssassin check: ham
    
    ===============================
    Details:
    ===============================
    
    HELO hostname: server1.myvpsdomain.com
    Source IP: [IP address]
    mail-from: noreply @ mywebsite.be
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    SPF check details:
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    Result: pass
    ID(s) verified: smtp.mailfrom=noreply @ mywebsite.be
    DNS record(s):
    mywebsite.be. SPF (no records)
    mywebsite.be. 10800 IN TXT "v=DKIM1; k=rsa; p=[...]"
    mywebsite.be. 10800 IN TXT "v=spf1 +a +mx +ip4:[IP address] +a:myvpsdomain.com +mx:myvpsdomain.com +ip4:[IP address]/32 +ip4:[other IP address] +ip4:[other IP address]/32 ~all"
    mywebsite.be. 10800 IN A [other IP address]
    mywebsite.be. 10800 IN MX 0 mywebsite.be.
    mywebsite.be. 10800 IN A [other IP address]
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    DomainKeys check details:
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    Result: neutral (message not signed)
    ID(s) verified: header.From=newsletter @ myotherwebsite.com
    DNS record(s):
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    DKIM check details:
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    Result: pass (signature verifies; identity doesn't match any headers)
    ID(s) verified: header.d=mywebsite.be
    
    [...]
    
    DNS record(s):
    default._domainkey.mywebsite.be. 10800 IN TXT "v=DKIM1; k=rsa; p=[...]"
    
    Public key used for verification: default._domainkey.mywebsite.be (1024 bits)
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    Sender-ID check details:
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    Result: neutral (SPF-Result: None)
    ID(s) verified: header.From=newsletter @ myotherwebsite.com
    DNS record(s):
    myotherwebsite.com. SPF (no records)
    myotherwebsite.com. TXT (no records)
    
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    SpamAssassin check details:
    ----------------------------------------------------------
    SpamAssassin v3.4.0 (2014-02-07)
    
    Result: ham (0.2 points, 5.0 required)
    
    pts rule name description
    ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
    0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked.
    See
    wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block
    for more information.
    [URIs: port25.com]
    0.0 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS From and EnvelopeFrom 2nd level mail
    domains are different
    -0.0 SPF_PASS SPF: sender matches SPF record
    -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
    [score: 0.0000]
    2.1 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_12 BODY: HTML: images with 800-1200 bytes of words
    0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message
    0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
    -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
    [/INDENT]
     
    #1 trucmuche, Mar 31, 2015
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 2, 2015
  2. trucmuche

    trucmuche Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2014
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    8
    cPanel Access Level:
    Root Administrator
    Well, the sender-id problem is solved : I got "pass" now. And I read that the domain keys are no longer used... So I think that the problem is solved :)
     
  3. cPanelMichael

    cPanelMichael Forums Analyst
    Staff Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2011
    Messages:
    44,379
    Likes Received:
    1,857
    Trophy Points:
    363
    cPanel Access Level:
    Root Administrator
    Hello,

    Right, support for domain keys with cPanel ended when DKIM was implemented. It should not cause any problems with mail acceptableness.

    Thank you.
     
    Stop hovering to collapse... Click to collapse... Hover to expand... Click to expand...
  4. trucmuche

    trucmuche Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 2014
    Messages:
    80
    Likes Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    8
    cPanel Access Level:
    Root Administrator
    Wonderful ! Thanks a lot !
     
Loading...

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice