Hi,
I had today a support case (cpanel insiders, see case 93484297) that I opened because incoming email messages that reached the server but were not delivered to their matching mailbox. The delivery report wrote "SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<[email protected]>: 554 5.7.1 <[email protected]>: Recipient address rejected: NO-DOMAIN."
Very unclear... it took me lots of googling to finally solve this, and enable the message to reach the mailbox - by changing, in the cpanel interface, in the section of "Email Routing", the value of my domain - from "Automatically Detect Configuration (recommended)" to "Local Mail Exchanger".
My take from this is asking you to change this section title to be "Routing Incoming Email". Yes, I know, "incoming" is written in the description inside this page, but it will be much better if the title will make it stronger.
I, silly me, until now was sure this section is for general email routing, meaning also for outgoing emails, so it possibly made me choose wrong here.
Thanks.
I had today a support case (cpanel insiders, see case 93484297) that I opened because incoming email messages that reached the server but were not delivered to their matching mailbox. The delivery report wrote "SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:<[email protected]>: 554 5.7.1 <[email protected]>: Recipient address rejected: NO-DOMAIN."
Very unclear... it took me lots of googling to finally solve this, and enable the message to reach the mailbox - by changing, in the cpanel interface, in the section of "Email Routing", the value of my domain - from "Automatically Detect Configuration (recommended)" to "Local Mail Exchanger".
My take from this is asking you to change this section title to be "Routing Incoming Email". Yes, I know, "incoming" is written in the description inside this page, but it will be much better if the title will make it stronger.
I, silly me, until now was sure this section is for general email routing, meaning also for outgoing emails, so it possibly made me choose wrong here.
Thanks.