Hi All-
Using cPanel & WHM v104.0.7
I need to make changes outlined here: https://classichelp.kayako.com/hc/en-us/articles/360006379540-Preventing-Piped-Email-Bounces Because piped emails, while being processed correctly, are generating a bounce back with errors to the sender.
Basically, I need to change return_output to return_fail_output.
IN the advanced exim config editor, towards the bottom is "Section: TRANSPORTMIDDLE" text box where this change should go. In fact, just underneath this box a commented out entry that specifically mentions this change:
#Set return_fail_output
# instead of return_output if you want this to happen only when the pipe fails
# to complete normally.
Problem is, if I try to add this customization, exim generates an error and says: "2022-08-03 12:23:39 Exim configuration error: there are two transports called "address_pipe" "
Cpanel support says this is not possible to make this change.....despite the above commented out entry elduing to the fact that it should be possible, or am i incorrect?
Has anyone been able to complete this change? Thanks.
Using cPanel & WHM v104.0.7
I need to make changes outlined here: https://classichelp.kayako.com/hc/en-us/articles/360006379540-Preventing-Piped-Email-Bounces Because piped emails, while being processed correctly, are generating a bounce back with errors to the sender.
Basically, I need to change return_output to return_fail_output.
IN the advanced exim config editor, towards the bottom is "Section: TRANSPORTMIDDLE" text box where this change should go. In fact, just underneath this box a commented out entry that specifically mentions this change:
#Set return_fail_output
# instead of return_output if you want this to happen only when the pipe fails
# to complete normally.
Problem is, if I try to add this customization, exim generates an error and says: "2022-08-03 12:23:39 Exim configuration error: there are two transports called "address_pipe" "
Cpanel support says this is not possible to make this change.....despite the above commented out entry elduing to the fact that it should be possible, or am i incorrect?
Has anyone been able to complete this change? Thanks.
Last edited by a moderator: