The Community Forums

Interact with an entire community of cPanel & WHM users!
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

[hackcheck] tcp_wrappers failed checksum test

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by man0n, Sep 1, 2004.

  1. man0n

    man0n Registered

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2004
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    I am receiving this mail from system:
    ############################################################
    IMPORTANT: Do not ignore this email.

    This message is to inform you that the rpm
    package tcp_wrappers did not match the expected checksum. This could mean that
    your system was compromised (OwN3D). The offending files have been removed
    and replaced with the OS default. To be safe you should verify that your
    system has not be compromised.

    Modified Files:
    Unsatisfied dependencies for tcp_wrappers-7.6-36: libc.so.6, libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0),
    libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1), libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3), libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3), libnsl.so.1, libnsl.so.1(GLIBC_2.0)

    ############################################################

    How can i fix it?
     
  2. bjarne

    bjarne Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2002
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    It s a Fedora problem I think. Maybe update server and run /scripts/hackcheck twice to se if it first replaces those rpms and then after is ok. I think is is safe to say that this is not a real hacker problem, but more some signature and a not so united distrubution. Basicly I suspect that Fedora kind of sucks a litle bit - compared to old Red Hat.
     
  3. bjarne

    bjarne Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2002
    Messages:
    135
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Well that did not work sopretty bad suggestion after all:)

    Fedora is a mess anyway - I am moving to Trustix:)
     
Loading...
Similar Threads - [hackcheck] tcp_wrappers failed
  1. asmithjr
    Replies:
    5
    Views:
    346

Share This Page