Hi All,
Currently I've got a server that is reporting "Detected 27 processes that are running outdated executables: 2968 2947 3167 2826 1545 3234 3473 2980 3479 1 2110 3188 2076 3488 2937 2879 3484 3231 136373 3463 2894 3226 3468 136126 436 2064 1576 Reboot the server to ensure the system benefits from these updates." - see also attached screenshot.
This is totally understandable and normal behaviour, I get that.
A few months ago I setup a recurring monthly maintenance plan for all my servers to ensure that they're all rebooted regularly so as to clear down all such processes that had accumulated over the course of the month. All good.
My question: what is best practice in this regard, because I made up that monthly recurring reboot on my own initiative
Should it be more frequent than monthly? Naturally we all want to reboot our servers less, not more, right?
Is it possible to differentiate between high risk processes/executables that really need the server to be rebooted sooner rather than later, as opposed to low risk ones where there's no hurry to reboot?
Thanks all,
Ross
Currently I've got a server that is reporting "Detected 27 processes that are running outdated executables: 2968 2947 3167 2826 1545 3234 3473 2980 3479 1 2110 3188 2076 3488 2937 2879 3484 3231 136373 3463 2894 3226 3468 136126 436 2064 1576 Reboot the server to ensure the system benefits from these updates." - see also attached screenshot.
This is totally understandable and normal behaviour, I get that.
A few months ago I setup a recurring monthly maintenance plan for all my servers to ensure that they're all rebooted regularly so as to clear down all such processes that had accumulated over the course of the month. All good.
My question: what is best practice in this regard, because I made up that monthly recurring reboot on my own initiative
Should it be more frequent than monthly? Naturally we all want to reboot our servers less, not more, right?
Is it possible to differentiate between high risk processes/executables that really need the server to be rebooted sooner rather than later, as opposed to low risk ones where there's no hurry to reboot?
Thanks all,
Ross
Attachments
-
16.1 KB Views: 8