yes, it is. i just did it before a week and it worked great. Just copy past the command to your consol and you are done.yemoller said:Is it safe to use this Guide to upgrade to ver.4.32.5?
thanks for the work to do this guide.
rony
yes, it is. i just did it before a week and it worked great. Just copy past the command to your consol and you are done.yemoller said:Is it safe to use this Guide to upgrade to ver.4.32.5?
Of course, if you've subscribed to the thread we know what you originally typedicanectc said:Im an idiot![]()
cpanel has discontinued the mailscanner package from their website. The url mentioned by sawbuck is maintained by chirpy i believe. You should find the updated information there.fikse said:any updates needed to this for Version 4.33 1st September 2004?
thanks
Mailscanner is way above more configurable than exiscan. It's hard to understand why both options shouldn't be supported.anand said:cpanel has discontinued the mailscanner package from their website. The url mentioned by sawbuck is maintained by chirpy i believe. You should find the updated information there.
yes its way too advanced, and way too much load on cpu for people where mail traffic is large. you would be surprised to see at times how much load mailscanner causes on a box. anyways its a personal choice, some choose exiscan, and some mailscanner. choose whatever works for you.goodmove said:Mailscanner is way above more configurable than exiscan. It's hard to understand why both options shouldn't be supported.
That's certainly true, as the config that comes with the Mailscanner package isn't well tuned. If you set it to only detect the emails against viruses and discard them without any notifications to either the sender or the recipient, coupled with using the ClamAV module, the load comes down considerably. You also get a lot of control on what you can do with other kinds of potentially harmful content such as codebase tags, inline HTML and forms.anand said:...you would be surprised to see at times how much load mailscanner causes on a box
yup i agree, still it can't come to the level of performance what exiscan delivers. yet its used mainly for the features it has over exiscan.goodmove said:That's certainly true, as the config that comes with the Mailscanner package isn't well tuned.
very truegoodmove said:Exiscan sounds a practical solution, though. Install it and forget it.![]()
That's good news. What would also be great is a front-end for users where they can whitelist and choose their own options about how to deal with virused emails and spam.chirpy said:Btw, I'm also considering adding an administrative front-end to MailScanner to make access to MailScanner even easier for administrators to configure it to their customers needs.