Steven, how nice of you to make your first post with miss information
Yes, we were notified by kernel community that we use GPL symbols while not licensing LVE module as GPL (by mistake, we were planning to use GPL symbols for test purposes only, but it slipped into production release). Within 2 weeks of being notified, we corrected the issue -- and provide complete sources for all our kernel and for LVE module released up to date. So, no -- we don't violate GPL at all. Btw, if you spend a bit more time researching the topic -- you would notice that GPL community was satisfied/and they don't consider it an issue any more.
We had always striven to be a good GPL citizen.
Also, not sure why you cannot find right kernel in source RPMs. It is there:
Index of /cloudlinux/6.3/updates/SRPMS
kernel-2.6.32-231.21.1.lve0.9.18.1.src.rpm 05-Jan-2012 09:55 69M
kernel-2.6.32-231.21.1.lve0.9.18.src.rpm 22-Dec-2011 12:21 69M
kernel-2.6.32-320.4.1.lve1.1.4.el6.src.rpm 07-Mar-2012 09:57 75M
kernel-2.6.32-320.4.1.lve1.1.7.el6.src.rpm 05-Jun-2012 04:19 76M
kernel-2.6.32-320.17.1.lve1.1.7.2.el6.src.rpm 29-Jun-2012 06:25 76M
kernel-2.6.32-320.17.1.lve1.1.7.3.el6.src.rpm 10-Jul-2012 09:36 77M
kernel-2.6.32-379.1.1.lve1.1.7.6.el6.src.rpm 09-Aug-2012 09:40 83M
kernel-2.6.32-379.1.1.lve1.1.9.5.1.el6.src.rpm 10-Sep-2012 08:46 83M
kernel-2.6.32-379.5.1.lve1.1.9.6.1.el6.src.rpm 24-Sep-2012 09:32 83M
kernel-2.6.32-379.11.1.lve1.1.9.8.2.el6.src.rpm 23-Nov-2012 05:30 84M
kernel-2.6.32-379.14.1.lve1.1.9.9.el6.src.rpm 06-Dec-2012 11:40 84M
kernel-2.6.32-379.19.1.lve1.2.7.el6.src.rpm 24-Jan-2013 04:48 84M
But if at any moment you see it missing -- please, email us, and we would correct it asap.
And sure - you can get 100% of kernel sources and LVE module from us.
