Many Failure Notice During Cpanel Update

bangjampang

Member
Apr 16, 2012
9
0
51
cPanel Access Level
Root Administrator
hello cpanel, i just got email from my server that notice my server got many of failure during the cpanel update with message like below :

An error was detected which prevented updatenow from completing normally.
Please review the enclosed log for further details

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[20121002.044604] Detected version '11.32.4.15' from version file.
[20121002.044604] Target version set to '11.32.5.10'
[20121002.044604] Switching to version '11.32.5.10' of updatenow to perform sync.
[20121002.044604] Updating to '11.32.5.10'
[20121002.044604] Syncing themes
[20121002.044604] Starting sync of x3 ...
[20121002.044604] Retrieving /cpanelsync/11.32.5.10/x3/.cpanelsync.bz2
[20121002.044604] Using mirror: 216.12.197.42
[20121002.044605] Retrieving /cpanelsync/11.32.5.10/x3/.locale.help/es/addoncgi/cpaddons.html.bz2
[20121002.044605] Retrieving /cpanelsync/11.32.5.10/x3/addoncgi/oldaddonshandler.html.bz2
[20121002.044606] Retrieving /cpanelsync/11.32.5.10/x3/css/cgi-min.css.bz2
[20121002.044606] Retrieving /cpanelsync/11.32.5.10/x3/css/cgi-min.css.gz
[20121002.044606] Retrieving /cpanelsync/11.32.5.10/x3/css/combined_optimized.css.bz2
[20121002.044606] Retrieving /cpanelsync/11.32.5.10/x3/css/combined_optimized.css.gz


also attach you the scrintshoot

error.jpg

my question is what is this, why this happen, is there any relativity with vulnerability or malware script?
 

mobcdi

Well-Known Member
Jul 13, 2009
109
0
66
I have a similar message when my update was triggered for the same upgrade (11.32.4.15 -> 11.32.5.10)
If you check the output do you see a message similar to

Retrieving /cpanelsync/11.32.5.10/cpanel/base/images/awstats/icon/flags/gr.png.bz2
E md5sum mismatch (actual: md5sumOutput) (expected: md5sumOutput) (size: 0)
Its the only thing I've found so far in the output that looks like an error that might cause the update to fail
 

Toliman

Registered
Feb 11, 2008
2
0
51
Happens to me as well.

[20121002.004324] Retrieving /cpanelsync/11.32.5.10/cpanel/base/images/awstats/icon/flags/gr.png.bz2
[20121002.004324] E md5sum mismatch (actual: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e) (expected: b15bb41e6a85b78e1c44f99de1bce677) (size: 0)
 

l00ph0le

Member
Aug 16, 2007
23
0
51
Same Here:
[20121002.015435] Retrieving /cpanelsync/11.32.5.10/cpanel/base/images/awstats/icon/flags/gr.png.bz2
[20121002.015435] E md5sum mismatch (actual: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e) (expected: b15bb41e6a85b78e1c44f99de1bce677) (size: 0)


Happens to me as well.
 

turbo2ltr

Member
Jun 3, 2011
21
3
53
Same here.
[20121002.004111] Retrieving /cpanelsync/11.32.5.10/cpanel/base/images/awstats/icon/flags/gr.png.bz2
[20121002.004111] E md5sum mismatch (actual: d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e) (expected: b15bb41e6a85b78e1c44f99de1bce677) (size: 0)
 

mobcdi

Well-Known Member
Jul 13, 2009
109
0
66
I opened a ticket and cPanel support say they have an internal ticket open. Its not a high priority for me given the update appears to have only minor changes according to the change log available via WHM
 

mobcdi

Well-Known Member
Jul 13, 2009
109
0
66
I'm just posting this for information purposes as I haven't tried it myself

cPanel support suggested rerunning upcp as not every user encountered the problem of the md5mismatch and the file that tripped up those that did encounter problems hasn't changed in years i.e. it isn't a new file
 

cPanelTristan

Quality Assurance Analyst
Staff member
Oct 2, 2010
7,607
43
348
somewhere over the rainbow
cPanel Access Level
Root Administrator
Hello,

The ticket opened (3246063) appeared to show no issues with the update that is now occurring.

Next, the internal case opened on the issue (61544) indicates we couldn't reproduce any md5sum mismatches for that specific file either and that the error doesn't appear to be occurring now any longer.

If anyone else does show the same error, please submit a ticket to us and reference case 61544 in the ticket opened along with this forum thread.

Thanks!