Package Editor Error

[AA2004]

Modified the package username_package


Encountered unkown setting in /var/cpanel/users/user: =

How can I troubleshoot it?

 

[chirpy]

You'll need to edit /var/cpanel/users/user and see if there's something awry.

 

[fuigus]

im getting the same thing but theres no such file there.

 

[fuigus]

this is happening on multiple servers that do have the user file also. They skipneomail=1 worked before and just started to show this to users.

 

[Secret Agent]

I'm facing this problem too

Error:

Encountered unkown setting in /var/cpanel/users/client: skiphorde=0Encountered unkown setting in /var/cpanel/users/client: skipneomail=1Encountered unkown setting in /var/cpanel/users/client: skipsqmail=1Encountered unkown setting in /var/cpanel/users/client: skiphorde=0Encountered unkown setting in /var/cpanel/users/client: skipneomail=1Encountered unkown setting in /var/cpanel/users/client: skipsqmail=1


BWLIMIT=10485760000
DNS=client.com
FEATURELIST=default
IP=69.9.166.50
LANG=english
MAXFTP=2
OWNER=client
PLAN=client_main
RS=x
STARTDATE=1096219556
skiphorde=0
skipneomail=1
skipsqmail=1

It was working fine the whole time

Anyone know the resolution to this?

I've done upcp --force, fix common problems also.

 

[RedFutura]

I am having this problem too. It has happened with many users. What is wrong?

 

[rs-freddo]

Be careful with the package editor, I found that all accounts affected by the change ended up with unlimited add-on domains. I had to edit each account manually to change add-on domains back to 0.

 

[pnl]

3 days ago i transfered my accounts 2 another server, and i have this problem too in all accounts. When i try terminate account, or edit package or anything i get this error, what must we do ?

WHM 10.8.0 cPanel 10.8.2-S120
RedHat Enterprise 4 i686 - WHM X v3.1.0

 

[pnl]

is anybody know the solve ?

 

[Bruceper]

I am receiving this error as well. I have deleted the account and submitted the account again and disabled the cgi access and the error still pops up with HASCGI=0 instead of HASCGI=1.

This is obviously a bug somewhere.