We've been seeing large disk latency since the beginning of the month on one of our CloudLinux 7 boxes and have traced that to php-fpm being unable to handle traffic. We've been tweaking settings (https://support.cpanel.net/hc/en-us/articles/360036533754-PHP-FPM-Performance-Tuning-Basics) but still are seeing runaway load averages due to the disk latency, mostly reads.
We've been using php-fpm for quite some time, now, and on our CloudLinux boxes we've been using lsapi. We've been moving accounts off of our older Centos6 boxes where most were using php-fpm and suexec with no issues, they transferred with php-fpm enabled, and we saw no reason to change.
However, according to this, we may be redundant:
https://support.cpanel.net/hc/en-us...w-to-switch-from-PHP-FPM-to-the-LSAPI-handler
But, wait! Apparently WordPressToolkit requires php-fpm to function:
forums.cpanel.net
We've been encouraging customers to use WordPress Toolkit to fix their out-of-date sites.
Can we shut off php-fpm? What happens to WordPress Toolkit?
We've been using php-fpm for quite some time, now, and on our CloudLinux boxes we've been using lsapi. We've been moving accounts off of our older Centos6 boxes where most were using php-fpm and suexec with no issues, they transferred with php-fpm enabled, and we saw no reason to change.
However, according to this, we may be redundant:
https://support.cpanel.net/hc/en-us...w-to-switch-from-PHP-FPM-to-the-LSAPI-handler
But, wait! Apparently WordPressToolkit requires php-fpm to function:
DEBATE on PHP-FPM I feel that it's a layer on top of an other layer
I would like your opinion on PHP-FPM... I was wondering why PHP-FPM is so popular ??? Sorry for worshippers of PHP-FPM, but I don't get it... I had only BAD, super BAD, and more than TERRIBLE outcome with that installed. In my server (Centos 7 + PHP 8 + latest WHM...) I had many time the cpu...
We've been encouraging customers to use WordPress Toolkit to fix their out-of-date sites.
Can we shut off php-fpm? What happens to WordPress Toolkit?
Last edited by a moderator: