This is just a thought but I was thinking that a slight rearrangement of the WHM services in the frame might save a lot of mouse movement. For example and arrangement of:
(1) Server Setup (although this is hardly used I guess it must stay on top for all the new installations, but really after that how often is this used?
(2) Account Functions
(3) Server Status
(4) Restart Services
(5) System Health
(6) DNS Functions
(7) IP Functions
(8) Software
(9) Packages & Billing
and the rest could be thrown in at the bottom. Basically what I\'m saying is that the services used most frequently should be placed at the top and those services infrequently used could go on the bottom.
Probably the best thing we can do is discuss this to determine which services ARE used the most and need to be at the top and which can be lower in the frame. This would provide Nick with the info he would need when/if he could take any action on this idea.
(1) Server Setup (although this is hardly used I guess it must stay on top for all the new installations, but really after that how often is this used?
(2) Account Functions
(3) Server Status
(4) Restart Services
(5) System Health
(6) DNS Functions
(7) IP Functions
(8) Software
(9) Packages & Billing
and the rest could be thrown in at the bottom. Basically what I\'m saying is that the services used most frequently should be placed at the top and those services infrequently used could go on the bottom.
Probably the best thing we can do is discuss this to determine which services ARE used the most and need to be at the top and which can be lower in the frame. This would provide Nick with the info he would need when/if he could take any action on this idea.