The Community Forums

Interact with an entire community of cPanel & WHM users!
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

RedHat Fedora2 vs Enterprise3 & cPanel

Discussion in 'General Discussion' started by Ver17, May 10, 2005.

  1. Ver17

    Ver17 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    156
    I am looking into using RedHat Linux on a new cPanel server I plan on running. Money is EXTREMLY tight right now and its not a big money making or critical server so I am looking at my OS options.

    I was looking for any feedback on the differences in running either RH Fedora Core 2 or RH Enterprise Linux 3 (besides support). Is Fedora2 that much more unstable, or maybe I should re-phrase that and ask, is Enterprise that much more stable? Are their any other major differences between the two other than support and maybe stablility? Is cPanel more prone to having issues with Fedora2?

    Thanks for any feedback you may have.....
     
    #1 Ver17, May 10, 2005
  2. gorilla

    gorilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    694
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    168
    Location:
    Sydney / Australia
    go for centOS3.4 which is the white label ( free ) for RHEP3
     
    #2 gorilla, May 10, 2005
  3. Ver17

    Ver17 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Really?!? I have never heard of that? Is it trully RedHat (not that I am band loyal)? Nice....
     
    #3 Ver17, May 10, 2005
  4. gorilla

    gorilla Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2004
    Messages:
    694
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    168
    Location:
    Sydney / Australia
    do a search on the forum, a lot of people are using it ;)
     
    #4 gorilla, May 10, 2005
  5. Ver17

    Ver17 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2004
    Messages:
    30
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    156
    Will do! Thanks for the info! Good Stuff!

    I guess the most important feature would be the ability to get easy automatic updates simular to the RedHat Network.... and to support all my servers hardware (which FreeBSD had a probelm with but Fedora did not) but I'm sure I'll find all this info once I do some reading :)
     
    #5 Ver17, May 10, 2005
    Last edited: May 10, 2005
  6. chirpy

    chirpy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2002
    Messages:
    13,472
    Likes Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    463
    Location:
    Go on, have a guess
    You should not use Fedora on production servers. As gorilla has said CentOS is the same as RedHat Enterprise without the proprietary bits (which you won't need) and the license cost, i.e. it's free:
    http://www.centos.org

    Here's a comparison between Fedora and RHE:
    http://fedora.redhat.com/about/rhel.html
     
    #6 chirpy, May 10, 2005
(You must log in or sign up to post here.)
Loading...
Similar Threads - RedHat Fedora2 Enterprise3
  1. craigedmonds

    Redhat has retired MySQL 5 in favor of Mariadb. Recommend using Mariadb 5 or above???

    craigedmonds, Feb 22, 2016, in forum: General Discussion
    Replies:
    6
    Views:
    545
    cPanelMichael
    Feb 23, 2016

Share This Page