Hi guys,
I need some advice please. It appears there are a number of issues with WHM's built-in incremental backup to remote locations and either it seems one has to purchase another product, or one just have to live with these defects.
Primary goal:
I need to have my backups stored "elsewhere". I can't have them on the server. There are commercial reasons for this, and redundancy reasons for this.
- Commercially disk space on a good server is expensive. One has to maximise that what one has for one's clients. If I have a server with 300 GB of data, and I want to back up, I need to have at least another 300 GB for a full backup. That blows the budget.
- For redundancy it doesn't make sense to store backups on the server anyway. What if the server blows? The disk crashes? Sure, this is worst case scenario, but if my backups are off-site or somewhere else I sleep better at night.
WHM has remote backup but restrictions as mentioned below.
Secondary goal:
We need to preserve disk space yet be able to quickly restore a backup.
After logging a ticket to try and understand why I can't see any restore option in the UI, I was told the reason is that any backup that's not local is not restorable until it's copied back to the server.
So although I can have backups offsite, to restore them, I need to find the admin or do it myself, then copy a massive file back onto the server, then try to restore. All while my clients think there is no restore available and critical restore time is consumed by manual copying of files. Surely this isn't an enterprise solution? Surely clients who grow with WHM feel the same pain, as their storage increases?
Third goal:
Our WHM servers are growing. So are our costs. Please tell me that the reason why WHM backup is broken for my need is *not* because they have a parallel business model selling backup software? Has there been any new development on WHM's backup in the last few years, since they've owned JetBackup?
Finally we are getting an error every day:
ssh slave timeout
Was told this is the problem:
Was logged 6 months ago and no solution. Advice to have it fixed?
I need some advice please. It appears there are a number of issues with WHM's built-in incremental backup to remote locations and either it seems one has to purchase another product, or one just have to live with these defects.
Primary goal:
I need to have my backups stored "elsewhere". I can't have them on the server. There are commercial reasons for this, and redundancy reasons for this.
- Commercially disk space on a good server is expensive. One has to maximise that what one has for one's clients. If I have a server with 300 GB of data, and I want to back up, I need to have at least another 300 GB for a full backup. That blows the budget.
- For redundancy it doesn't make sense to store backups on the server anyway. What if the server blows? The disk crashes? Sure, this is worst case scenario, but if my backups are off-site or somewhere else I sleep better at night.
WHM has remote backup but restrictions as mentioned below.
Secondary goal:
We need to preserve disk space yet be able to quickly restore a backup.
After logging a ticket to try and understand why I can't see any restore option in the UI, I was told the reason is that any backup that's not local is not restorable until it's copied back to the server.
So although I can have backups offsite, to restore them, I need to find the admin or do it myself, then copy a massive file back onto the server, then try to restore. All while my clients think there is no restore available and critical restore time is consumed by manual copying of files. Surely this isn't an enterprise solution? Surely clients who grow with WHM feel the same pain, as their storage increases?
Third goal:
Our WHM servers are growing. So are our costs. Please tell me that the reason why WHM backup is broken for my need is *not* because they have a parallel business model selling backup software? Has there been any new development on WHM's backup in the last few years, since they've owned JetBackup?
Finally we are getting an error every day:
ssh slave timeout
Was told this is the problem:
Was logged 6 months ago and no solution. Advice to have it fixed?