Should there be a /home/virtfs/%username% mount for every user? Should this stay persistent?
I'm only seeing some of my users have a /home/virtfs/%username% directory. I'm not seeing a rhyme or reason behind this either. Practically all of the users that exist in /home/virtfs don't have shell access enabled.
I really figured all users had a corresponding /home/virtfs/%username% mount. But that does not appear to be the case. Is that by design?
I'm only seeing some of my users have a /home/virtfs/%username% directory. I'm not seeing a rhyme or reason behind this either. Practically all of the users that exist in /home/virtfs don't have shell access enabled.
I really figured all users had a corresponding /home/virtfs/%username% mount. But that does not appear to be the case. Is that by design?