Hi,
Coming across an issue and I can't quite understand why this route was taken during design.
When I clone a staging site I'm given the option to clone tables "Except: jV3QiBj_postmeta, jV3QiBj_posts, jV3QiBj_usermeta, jV3QiBj_users"
But this also includes Pages....the main thing I'd have thought plenty of Wordpress users would want to be changing and updating.
At first I thought the clone tool was totally broken until I realised it was this setting causing the issue.
If I'm working on a staging site I totally get why I might not want users and posts overwritten from the staging site as it's out of date data.
But my Pages, the information I've actually been updating....that's what I want to update back to my live site.
Should these not be separate options on what information I want to update?
Coming across an issue and I can't quite understand why this route was taken during design.
When I clone a staging site I'm given the option to clone tables "Except: jV3QiBj_postmeta, jV3QiBj_posts, jV3QiBj_usermeta, jV3QiBj_users"
But this also includes Pages....the main thing I'd have thought plenty of Wordpress users would want to be changing and updating.
At first I thought the clone tool was totally broken until I realised it was this setting causing the issue.
If I'm working on a staging site I totally get why I might not want users and posts overwritten from the staging site as it's out of date data.
But my Pages, the information I've actually been updating....that's what I want to update back to my live site.
Should these not be separate options on what information I want to update?